NewsMakers
Spending more than 3 hours a day sedentary worsens teens’ mental health
Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day engaged in sedentary behaviors – including playing video games, reading for leisure or spending a lot of time distracted by screens – have a higher risk of facing psychological distress in the future.
Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day engaged in sedentary behaviors – including playing video games, reading for leisure or spending a lot of time distracted by screens – have a higher risk of facing psychological distress in the future, according to a study published in the Journal of Adolescent Health.
On the other hand, moderate screen exposure (between 60 and 119 minutes per day) invested in educational activities, such as doing homework or attending classes, was considered a “protective” factor associated with less psychological distress.
Sedentary behavior among adolescents has become a growing problem worldwide, with significant implications for the physical and mental health of the population in this age group. Several studies have shown that a lack of physical activity, especially when combined with excessive use of electronic devices, contributes to an increase in problems such as obesity and cardiovascular disease.
In addition, a growing body of research shows that the effects of a sedentary lifestyle are not limited to the physical body, but can also affect mental health, increasing feelings of anxiety and depression, for example.
The study, conducted at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King’s College London in the United Kingdom, analyzed information from 3,675 adolescents who were part of the Millennium Cohort Study, a project that follows children born between 2000 and 2002 and maintains a large database.
The analysis included information on sedentary behavior collected at two points in time: when the adolescents were 14 years old and then at the age of 17. In the first phase, the participants completed a diary in which they recorded the different activities they performed every ten minutes. These activities were categorized into broader contexts: general physical activity, time spent sleeping, recreational screen time, non-screen recreational time, and educational sedentary behavior.
At age 17, the same participants reported their psychological distress using a six-question questionnaire about their feelings, using a tool known as the Kessler Scale. The questions included “how often in the past 30 days” did the participant feel nervous, hopeless, restless, depressed, anxious, and worthless. Analysis of the scores, based on the scale, indicated whether or not they were in psychological distress.
According to André de Oliveira Werneck, author of the article and doctoral student at the Center for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health at the School of Public Health of the University of São Paulo (FSP-USP) in Brazil, the fact that the research was based on responses to sedentary behavior recorded in a diary is one of the differences that make the results so relevant.
Werneck explains that there are several ways to measure sedentary behavior. One of them, which is more objective, uses an accelerometer (a type of device that measures how much a person moves), but it cannot distinguish between different sedentary activities, which are very broad.
“Sedentary behavior includes a variety of activities, such as using a computer, watching television, reading, listening to music, or attending class. Most research focuses on analyzing total sitting time, but we can have positive sedentary activities, such as attending class and doing homework, for example. And there are activities that are not beneficial, such as spending too much time on the Internet or playing video games,” he explains.
A second method of measuring sedentary behavior is subjective, in which people answer a questionnaire about how much time they spend sedentary, watching TV, playing video games, working, or studying in a typical week. Nevertheless, it depends on the participant’s memory.
“Having a record of all the activities of these adolescents, formalized in a diary, provides a much more faithful result and has a more reliable accuracy of the different time periods. It’s not common to use this type of tool, precisely because it’s difficult to implement,” says the doctoral student, who carried out the study as part of a research internship funded by FAPESP.
Impact of reading
To analyze the data, the researchers adjusted for several covariates, including gender, parental education, net family income, parental psychological distress, body mass index, physical activity, total sedentary time and depressive symptoms.
After cross-checking the information, they found that the adolescents spent an average of four hours a day in educational sedentary behavior (school, homework) and about three hours a day in screen and non-screen sedentary behavior. Those who spent more than 180 minutes a day on screens for leisure were associated with greater psychological distress at age 17.
Similarly – and surprisingly – the researchers found that those who spent more than three hours a day reading for leisure (especially boys) also reported more psychological distress. According to the study, while previous research has shown that reading is associated with better mental health outcomes and other healthy behaviors, this new research suggests that excessive reading may be harmful in some cases.
One of the hypotheses to explain this finding, says Werneck, is that adolescents who spend many hours reading are “displacing” time that could be spent on activities with face-to-face or outdoor social interactions, which are protective, leading to greater isolation. In addition, it is possible that some of the reading is done on screen devices (cell phones, computers or tablets), which is also harmful – there are studies in adults that link screen reading to poorer sleep because of exposure to blue light.
“This is an unexpected finding in the study, but it’s important to emphasize that very few adolescents spend a lot of time reading for leisure. Our main finding, given the general context, is that more leisure screen time [video games] was associated with worse psychological distress, while more time in educational activities was associated with less distress,” he says.
Professor Brendon Stubbs, who supervised the study, told Agência FAPESP by email that the study revealed several worrying patterns. “We found that adolescents who spent more than three hours a day on screen-based leisure activities showed significantly greater psychological distress three years later. Video games were particularly influential, with each additional hour associated with a 3% increase in psychological distress.”
According to Stubbs, the results suggest a clear dose-response relationship between excessive recreational screen time and future mental health outcomes. “Importantly, this relationship was context-dependent, meaning that educational screen time did not show the same negative effects, highlighting that the problem is not screen use per se, but how and why screens are used.”
How to minimize the impact
Based on the findings, the researchers suggest interventions that could help minimize the negative psychological effects:
- Set clear limits on screen time: Implement guidelines that limit recreational screen time to less than three hours per day, as the study results show that this is when the risks increase significantly;
- Focus on context: Encourage more educational and structured screen activities rather than passive recreational screen time. The study found that educational screen time had no negative effects;
- Balance activities: Promote alternative leisure activities with social interaction components, as isolated screen time can contribute to psychological distress;
- Gender-specific approaches: Consider personalized interventions, as work has found gender differences in effects (e.g., girls were more associated with screen use for Internet browsing, boys for video games);
- Educational support: Since moderate amounts of homework and class time have been associated with less psychological distress, ensure adequate academic engagement;
- Manage and optimize screen time instead of eliminating it altogether.
Werneck emphasizes that sedentary behavior is very complex, and for adolescents, each activity and context needs to be evaluated separately. “We need to focus on interventions that not only reduce sedentary behavior but also reduce it in some specific and very long activities that are more associated with psychological distress,” he concludes.
NewsMakers
Scheduling dental care during prenatal visits boosts oral health care during pregnancy
Scheduling a dental appointment during prenatal clinic visits—a simple, no-cost task that doesn’t require extra staff—increases the likelihood that patients later see a dentist during pregnancy.
Prenatal visits might include bloodwork, discussions of due dates and vitamins, and ultrasounds. What if these visits could also improve oral health care among pregnant patients?
New research shows that scheduling a dental appointment during prenatal clinic visits—a simple, no-cost task that doesn’t require extra staff—increases the likelihood that patients later see a dentist during pregnancy.
The study, published in the American Journal of Public Health, demonstrates the benefit of coordination among health providers and integrating oral health into prenatal care, especially for vulnerable patient populations.
Historically, dentists avoided treating women during pregnancy unless it was an emergency, or only provided care during the second trimester. This guidance changed once studies showed that routine and emergency dental care is safe during pregnancy—and current obstetric and dental guidelines stress that dental care can and should be provided during this critical period.
Moreover, pregnancy increases the risk of some oral health conditions, including gum inflammation and sometimes tooth decay, making routine dental care even more important during pregnancy. Some oral health issues may affect the fetus or even be transmissible to the child after birth.
Marginalized groups, including low-income individuals and those insured by Medicaid, are known to have higher rates of dental disease. Yet women enrolled in Medicaid are far less likely to see a dentist for a cleaning during pregnancy compared to women with private insurance.
“Many of those vulnerable to oral disease enter pregnancy with dental disease, and this may worsen during pregnancy,” said study author Stefanie Russell, associate professor at Rutgers School of Dental Medicine and an adjunct associate professor at NYU College of Dentistry, who led this research while at NYU.
One way to try and increase dental care among pregnant women is to reach them where they already are: their prenatal appointments. To bridge this gap, researchers and clinicians at NYU College of Dentistry teamed up with neighboring NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue, the oldest public hospital in the US, to create the New York University/Bellevue Prenatal Oral Health Program.
During weekly sessions at Bellevue’s prenatal clinic, pregnant patients receive a standardized screening to assess their oral health. Those with dental needs are referred to NYU College of Dentistry for follow-up care, educated about the importance and safety of dental care during pregnancy, and informed that Medicaid covers dental care in New York.
From 2018 to 2020, 420 prenatal patients with Medicaid coverage were referred to NYU Dentistry for follow-up dental care; the majority were Hispanic, and roughly half spoke Spanish as their first language. Referrals for dental care took two forms: immediately scheduled dental appointments made before the patient left the prenatal clinic or through a patient navigator. The patient navigator—a bilingual professional—educated patients regarding oral health, reminded patients of their upcoming dental appointments, and followed up after to identify any issues.
Nearly 44 percent of patients referred to NYU College of Dentistry followed through with a dental appointment. Both immediate appointment scheduling and the patient navigator increased the chances of a patient receiving dental care, but those who had appointments scheduled at their prenatal visit were 2.6 times more likely to see a dentist than those without appointments scheduled—even more likely than those who worked with the patient navigator.
“This suggests that immediately scheduled dental appointments can be an effective way to increase dental care utilization during pregnancy, without needing to hire extra staff,” said study author Shulamite Huang, assistant professor of epidemiology and health promotion at NYU College of Dentistry.
The authors conclude that integrating oral health screening in a prenatal clinic is feasible and increases engagement with dental care during pregnancy. They are continuing their research to measure whether this care improves oral health outcomes and to better understand how dental screening can be successfully integrated with prenatal care in other settings.
“A warm hand-off is key for addressing part of the barriers to dental care during pregnancy. Our team plans to further investigate and optimize interventions addressing both patient-, provider-, and healthcare system-level barriers to dental care during pregnancy,” said Huang.
Additional study authors include Richard Heyman and Mary Kang of NYU Dentistry; Belkys Saba, formerly of NYU Dentistry; Chloe Bird of the Tufts University School of Medicine; and Chengwu Yang of the Florida Atlantic University Schmidt College of Medicine.
NewsMakers
Why a UTI hurts — and why that might be a good thing
Australian researchers have discovered a previously overlooked group of bladder nerves that help detect urinary tract infections (UTIs) and trigger the body’s response to clear them, providing a potential new target for future bladder pain therapies.
Australian researchers have discovered a previously overlooked group of bladder nerves that help detect urinary tract infections (UTIs) and trigger the body’s response to clear them, providing a potential new target for future bladder pain therapies.
The study shows that bladder nerves located close to the lining of the bladder act as a frontline infection sensor, helping the body recognise UTIs and trigger responses that reduce the severity and spread of infection.
UTIs are among the most common bacterial infections worldwide, with more than 400 million cases reported every year. Nearly one in three women will experience UTIs before the age of 24, and many elderly people and those with bladder issues from spinal cord injuries can experience multiple UTIs in a single year.
Symptoms often include frequent urination, a sudden urge to urinate, pain during urination, and pelvic discomfort can be debilitating for some patients.
Flinders University’s Dr Luke Grundy says that while scientists have long understood how the bladder senses as it fills and triggers urination, the role of a specialised group of bladder nerves near the bladder lining has remained unclear.
“Most bladder nerves act like a fuel gauge, telling the brain when the bladder is filling up and needs emptying,” says Dr Grundy, Head of the NeuroUrology Research Group at Flinders University.
“The nerves we studied in this research are different. They sit close to the bladder lining and appear to act more like an early warning system, detecting infection and inflammation.
“They don’t just sense infection. They help coordinate the body’s response to it by triggering pain and urinary frequency, behaviours that appear to help clear bacteria from the bladder as part of the body’s defence system.”
Lead author and recently graduated PhD student Dr Cindy Tay says the discovery changes how these nerves are understood.
“These mucosal nerves have puzzled scientists for almost two decades because they stay quiet while the bladder fills and empties, which is the main job of the bladder,” says Dr Tay.
“What we’ve found is that they have a hidden job — acting as an early warning system that springs into action the moment infection takes hold.”
The research team developed a novel method to selectively study a specialised group of sensory nerves in the bladder lining of mice, revealing that while these nerves play little role in normal bladder function, they become highly responsive during a UTI and help detect and respond to infection.
“When the bladder is healthy, these nerves are relatively quiet, but during a urinary tract infection they become highly sensitive and respond to the presence of bacteria and inflammation,” says Dr Grundy.
“It may feel unpleasant, but urinating more frequently actually helps clear the infection by flushing out the harmful bacteria.”
The study also helps explain why people with conditions affecting nerve function may be more prone to recurrent or severe UTIs.
“If the nerves that detect infection aren’t working properly, the body may not respond as effectively,” says Dr Grundy.
Building on previous research, the new study reveals a deeper understanding of how UTIs affect bladder function and the nervous system, and could help develop new treatments that target these nerves to relieve UTI-related symptoms.
“Our findings provide new insight into how the bladder detects and responds to infection, helping explain the biological processes that drive the pain, urgency and discomfort commonly experienced during UTIs,” says Dr Grundy
Researchers say the next challenge is to develop therapies that ease the pain and urgency associated with UTIs while preserving the protective role these nerves play in fighting infection.
The paper, ‘Bladder mucosal afferents detect UTI and aid pathogen clearance,’ by Cindy Tay, Harman Sharma, Stewart Ramsay (University of Adelaide), Georgia Bourlotos, Sarah K Manning, Natalie E Stevens, Sophie J Miller, Geraint B Rogers, David J Lynn, Feargal J Ryan, Andrea M Harrington (University of Adelaide), Vladimir Zagorodnyuk, Steven L Taylor and Luke Grundy was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
NewsMakers
Pregnancy complications can signal heart disease risk years before traditional screening, study finds
Some women, particularly younger women often considered low risk, may face a higher risk of heart disease earlier than previously recognized.
McGill University researchers have developed a new tool to identify heart disease risk in women earlier in life.
Findings from a study published in JACC: Advances highlight gaps in existing approaches.
“Heart disease is the leading cause of death in women, yet existing risk tools were developed in older populations and ignore factors unique to women,” said senior author Robert Platt, Professor in the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health and Director of the School of Population and Global Health.
While pregnancy complications are known to be linked to future heart risk, there has been no way to identify which younger women are most at risk, he added.
Detecting risk earlier
Using health data from more than 260,000 women in the UK aged 15 to 45 who had given birth, researchers developed and validated a prediction model to estimate future heart disease risk. Participants were followed for nearly four years after delivery.
The model identified several factors – not included in existing tools – that can help predict risk, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, PCOS, depression, thyroid disorders, oral contraceptive use and social deprivation.
The findings suggest some women, particularly younger women often considered low risk, may face a higher risk of heart disease earlier than previously recognized.
“Millions of women who give birth each year are never considered candidates for cardiovascular risk assessment simply because of their age,” said co-author Kristian Filion, Professor in the Departments of Medicine and of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health.
If integrated into routine postpartum care, this tool could enable earlier monitoring, lifestyle counselling or referral to a specialist, potentially helping prevent a heart attack or stroke later in life, he added.
The next step is to validate the model in Canada and the United States. In the longer term, the goal is to integrate a practical calculator into electronic health records so higher-risk patients can be identified earlier.
About the study
“Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Risk in Reproductive-Aged Women” by Sonia Grandi, Kristian Filion, Jennifer Hutcheon, Graeme Smith, and Robert Platt was published in JACC: Advances. The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
-
NewsMakers2 weeks agoFilipinos prioritize independence as legacy for longer lives
-
NewsMakers4 weeks agoLoneliness strongly linked to poorer mental health and wellbeing, study finds
-
NewsMakers4 weeks agoWeight loss drugs could help with binge eating disorder
-
NewsMakers3 weeks agoCoffee and heart health: How many cups of caffeinated coffee are safe to drink each day?
-
Destinations3 weeks agoGoing Chinese in Pulilan, Bulacan
-
Home Care4 weeks agoHow to prepare and protect homes from costly storm-related electrical damage
-
Destinations2 weeks agoEating out in Cebu in one place via Pusô Village
-
NewsMakers2 weeks agoPregnancy complications can signal heart disease risk years before traditional screening, study finds
