Connect with us

NewsMakers

Excessive screen time among youth may pose heart health risks

Increased recreational screen time was significantly associated with higher cardiovascular risks and cardiometabolic risks among children and adolescents.

Published

on

Children and young adults who spend excessive hours glued to screens and electronic devices may have higher risks for cardiometabolic diseases, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol and insulin resistance, according to new research published in the Journal of the American Heart Association.

A 2023 scientific statement from the American Heart Association noted that “cardiometabolic risk is accruing at younger and younger ages,” and only 29% of American youth, ages 2 to 19 years, had favorable cardiometabolic health based on 2013-2018 data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

This analysis of more than 1,000 participants in two studies in Denmark found that increased recreational screen time was significantly associated with higher cardiovascular risks and cardiometabolic risks among children and adolescents.

“Limiting discretionary screen time in childhood and adolescence may protect long-term heart and metabolic health,” said study lead author David Horner, M.D., PhD., a researcher at the Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood (COPSAC) at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. “Our study provides evidence that this connection starts early and highlights the importance of having balanced daily routines.”

Using data from a group of 10-year-olds studied in 2010 and a group of 18-year-olds in 2000 that were part of the Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood cohorts, researchers examined the relationship between screen time and cardiometabolic risk factors. Screen time included time spent watching TV, movies, gaming or using phones, tablets or computers for leisure.

Researchers developed a composite score based on a cluster of metabolic syndrome components — waist size, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein or HDL “good” cholesterol, triglycerides and blood sugar levels – and adjusted for sex and age. The cardiometabolic score reflected a participant’s overall risk relative to the study group average (measured in standard deviations): 0 means average risk, and 1 means one standard deviation above average.

The analysis found that each extra hour of screen time increased the cardiometabolic score by about 0.08 standard deviations in the 10-year-olds and 0.13 standard deviations in the 18-year-olds. “This means a child with three extra hours of screen time a day would have roughly a quarter to half a standard-deviation higher risk than their peers,” Horner said.

“It’s a small change per hour, but when screen time accumulates to three, five or even six hours a day, as we saw in many adolescents, that adds up,” he said. “Multiply that across a whole population of children, and you’re looking at a meaningful shift in early cardiometabolic risk that could carry into adulthood.”

The analysis also found that both sleep duration and sleep timing affected the relationship between screen time and cardiometabolic risk. Both shorter sleep duration and going to sleep later intensified the relationship between screen time and cardiometabolic risk. Children and adolescents who had less sleep showed significantly higher risk associated with the same amount of screen time.

“In childhood, sleep duration not only moderated this relationship but also partially explained it: about 12% of the association between screen time and cardiometabolic risk was mediated through shorter sleep duration,” Horner said. “These findings suggest that insufficient sleep may not only magnify the impact of screen time but could be a key pathway linking screen habits to early metabolic changes.”

In addition, a machine learning analysis identified a unique metabolic signature in the blood that appeared to be associated with screen time.

“We were able to detect a set of blood-metabolite changes, a ‘screen-time fingerprint,’ validating the potential biological impact of the screen time behavior,” he said. “Using the same metabolomics data, we also assessed whether screen time was linked to predicted cardiovascular risk in adulthood, finding a positive trend in childhood and a significant association in adolescence. This suggests that screen-related metabolic changes may carry early signals of long-term heart health risk.

“Recognizing and discussing screen habits during pediatric appointments could become part of broader lifestyle counseling, much like diet or physical activity,” he said. “These results also open the door to using metabolomic signatures as early objective markers of lifestyle risk.”

Amanda Marma Perak, M.D., M.S.CI., FAHA, chair of the American Heart Association’s Young Hearts Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Committee, who was not involved in this research, said focusing on sleep is a great starting point to change screen time patterns.

“If cutting back on screen time feels difficult, start by moving screentime earlier and focusing on getting into bed earlier and for longer,” said Perak, an assistant professor of pediatrics and preventive medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago.

Adults can also set an example, she said. “All of us use screens, so it’s important to guide kids, teens and young adults to healthy screen use in a way that grows with them. As a parent, you can model healthy screen use – when to put it away, how to use it, how to avoid multitasking. And as kids get a little older, be more explicit, narrating why you put away your devices during dinner or other times together.

“Make sure they know how to entertain and soothe themselves without a screen and can handle being bored! Boredom breeds brilliance and creativity, so don’t be bothered when your kids complain they’re bored. Loneliness and discomfort will happen throughout life, so those are opportunities to support and mentor your kids in healthy ways to respond that don’t involve scrolling.”

As an observational study using prospectively collected data, the findings reflect associations rather than proving cause and effect. Moreover, parents of the 10-year-olds and the 18-year-olds reported screen time through questionnaires, which may not accurately reflect the actual time youth spent on screens.

Horner suggested that future research could explore whether limiting screen use in the hours before sleep, when light from screen exposure may disrupt circadian rhythms and disrupt sleep onset, may be an avenue to help reduce cardiometabolic risk.

NewsMakers

For weight loss, where food comes from may matter as much as how it is processed

Processed and ultra-processed animal foods tended to track with weight gain, and minimally processed plant foods with weight loss, although these associations were weaker. Ultra-processed plant foods were not associated with weight change.

Published

on

Eating more meat, fish, eggs, and dairy products was associated with weight gain even when those foods were minimally processed, according to a study from the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine published in Nutrition Research. Minimally processed plant foods, such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and beans, showed the opposite pattern.

“Ultra-processed foods get most of the blame for weight gain, but our results suggest we also need to ask whether a food comes from a plant or an animal,” says lead author Hana Kahleova, MD, PhD, director of clinical research at the Physicians Committee. “A chicken breast is minimally processed. So is an apple. In our study, they did not move the scale in the same direction.”

The researchers analyzed data from a randomized crossover trial in which 62 adults with overweight followed a Mediterranean diet, rich in olive oil, fish, and nuts, and a low-fat vegan diet for 16 weeks each, separated by a four-week washout. Participants kept three-day diet records, and every food was classified by degree of processing, using the NOVA system, and by whether it came from a plant or an animal.

Compared with the Mediterranean diet, the vegan diet cut minimally processed animal foods by 135 grams per day more and raised minimally processed plant foods by 202 grams per day more. Processed animal and plant foods also fell more on the vegan diet. Across both diets, eating more minimally processed animal foods was linked to weight gain; this was the strongest association in the analysis and the only one to remain statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons.

Processed and ultra-processed animal foods tended to track with weight gain, and minimally processed plant foods with weight loss, although these associations were weaker. Ultra-processed plant foods were not associated with weight change.

In the main trial, published in 2022, participants lost an average of 6 kilograms (about 13 pounds) on the vegan diet, with no change on the Mediterranean diet. Minimally processed plant foods are high in fiber and water and low in calorie density, which helps people feel full on fewer calories.

“If you want to lose weight, fill your plate with beans, vegetables, fruits, and whole grains, and leave the animal products off,” says Dr. Kahleova. “The degree of processing still matters, but it is not the whole story.”

Continue Reading

NewsMakers

Mindfulness and self-compassion can alleviate premenstrual symptoms

It is estimated that PMS affects approximately 20-30% of  menstruating people, while PMDD impacts 3-8%. The scale of the problem is significant, yet the psychological factors that protect against the development of these symptoms have not been thoroughly investigated.

Published

on

A kind attitude toward oneself and practicing mindfulness can improve functioning in individuals who experience severe premenstrual symptoms, according to a study by psychologists from SWPS University and Jagiellonian University.

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and its more severe form, premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), cause distressing psychological and physical symptoms, including mood swings, fatigue, concentration difficulties, headaches, and muscle pain. These ailments occur during the second phase of the menstrual cycle and interfere with daily functioning, affecting education, work, relationships, and overall quality of life.

Up to 30 percent of women affected

It is estimated that PMS affects approximately 20-30% of  menstruating people, while PMDD impacts 3-8%. The scale of the problem is significant, yet the psychological factors that protect against the development of these symptoms have not been thoroughly investigated.

The study, published in “Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice”, is part of a broader project analysing potential mechanisms and factors that may protect against the onset of PMS and PMDD. In a new study, Rachela Antosz-Rekucka, PhD, a psychologist at the Institute of Psychology at SWPS University, and Katarzyna Prochwicz, PhD, a professor at the Institute of Psychology of the Jagiellonian University, analysed factors that might protect against the onset of severe premenstrual symptoms. They examined variables such as the sense of coherence, mindfulness skills, and self-compassion, and investigated their relationship with past trauma, perceived stress levels, and symptoms of premenstrual disorders.

The study involved 228 participants aged 18 to 52. They were asked about their past experiences with premenstrual symptoms, and a part of the group subsequently tracked their symptoms over the course of two menstrual cycles.

Self-compassion and mindfulness help alleviate symptoms

The results suggest that higher levels of certain psychological resources can moderate the negative effect of stress and trauma on the severity of menstrual cycle-related symptoms.

Specific psychological attitudes may noticeably reduce the impact of daily stress on the severity of premenstrual symptoms. These include a kind attitude toward oneself and the acceptance of difficult moments, known as self-compassion. This approach helps women to navigate the challenging phases of their cycle more easily, even during times of intense nervous tension, says Rachela Antosz-Rekucka of SWPS University, who conducted the study as part of her doctoral research at the Jagiellonian University.

Practicing mindfulness (directing one’s attention to the present moment without judgment or worry) can also offer relief. In the context of PMS and PMDD, refraining from judging one’s own emotional reactions is particularly helpful, as it prevents the magnification of perceived discomfort. Furthermore, individuals with a strong sense of coherence cope better with rising premenstrual stress.

Past trauma and premenstrual symptoms

For individuals with a history of trauma, the ability to precisely describe their internal states and feelings, combined with the capacity to avoid judging their own emotional reactions, can help mitigate the negative impact of that trauma on premenstrual symptoms.

Psychological resources boost stress resilience

The results of the study could be significant for many people who menstruate. These findings could pave the way for modern therapeutic programs based on approaches such as mindfulness training or self-compassion-focused therapy, potentially reducing the reliance on medication.

The study suggests that more understanding, mindful, and compassionate attitude towards oneself may benefit individuals with severe premenstrual symptoms. PMS and PMDD are chronic conditions, which is why interventions such as mindfulness-based therapy, compassion-focused therapy, or strategies oriented at enhancing the sense of coherence, may help individuals navigate their conditions more effectively, and possibly increase their overall quality of life, Rachela Antosz-Rekucka emphasises.

Continue Reading

NewsMakers

Music can enhance the flavor of your food

The brain does not create flavor based solely on signals from the tongue.

Published

on

The moment we take a sip of our morning coffee or our first bite of lunch, the brain begins interpreting what we taste. Is it sweet? Sour? Or something else entirely?

But the brain does not create flavor based solely on signals from the tongue. That is the finding of a new study from the Department of Food Science, published in the scientific journal Scientific Reports.

“When music reaches the ears at the same time as we are eating, we can see that the brain responds more strongly than when taste is experienced without music,” says first author and postdoctoral researcher Alberte Baggesgaard Seeberg from the Department of Food Science.

Using brain scans, the researchers show that music can activate some of the same brain regions involved in processing taste.

“This tells us that flavour is not simply a property of food. Flavor is an experience created by the brain,” says senior author and associate professor Janice Wang.

A breakthrough in brain imaging

This is the first time researchers have used brain imaging to show what happens in the brain when it processes taste. In the study, they used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which measures activity in different parts of the brain by detecting changes in blood flow.

“This allows us to move beyond simply asking people about their experiences, which has been the approach in previous studies. With brain scans, we gain a biological window into what happens when the senses interact,” says Alberte Baggesgaard Seeberg.

While participants lay in the scanner, their brain activity was measured under different conditions. In some cases, they listened only to music. In others, they tasted flavor solutions. In some trials, music and taste were presented simultaneously. This enabled the researchers to compare how the brain responds to sound and taste separately and in combination.

The results clearly showed that certain brain regions were more active when participants listened to music while tasting one of the two flavor solutions.

“We can see that flavor is constructed by the brain and not only by the taste buds. What determines flavor is not limited to what happens on the tongue. It emerges through the integration of multiple senses,” says Janice Wang.

The findings build on previous studies showing that music can enhance particular taste perceptions. For example, slow pop music with harmonious tones may enhance sweetness. Until now, however, this has only been investigated through behavioral studies in which participants rated flavours with and without music.

Shaping flavor experiences could improve wellbeing

According to the researchers, the new knowledge could be used to design better eating experiences in a range of settings, including restaurants, canteens and hospitals.

“For people who are at risk of malnutrition, something as simple as music could potentially improve the eating experience. There is a great deal we can do, often at very little cost, to improve quality of life for some people,” says Alberte Baggesgaard Seeberg.

Janice Wang is pleased that, after many years of research into flavour and sensory perception, the team can now present biological evidence of how the senses interact.

“We now have a new way of influencing flavor perception, creating a better meal experience and potentially a better overall experience, without necessarily changing the food itself,” she says.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Like Us On Facebook

Loading...

Most Popular

Copyright ©FRINGE PUBLISHING. All rights reserved.