Travel
Pure Oceans: Protecting our seas from plastic
Around 30 people from the local barangays of Tingloy, plus a contingent from the Philippine Coast Guard, have gathered along the shores of Barangay Marikaban to retrieve sachets, plastic bottles, bottle caps, ropes and anything that doesn’t naturally belong here.

Tingloy, Batangas – This beach is pretty remote, but somehow, it’s still covered in trash.
Mixed in with the usual influx of driftwood and seaweed are countless sachets, plastic bottles and toys – ranging from lightsabers to creepy doll heads.
“We’ll conduct a closed loop cleanup today,” Tak Vergara of Pure Oceans explains to gathered volunteers. “You’ll each be given a mesh sack, to be filled with just one type of trash. Once done, we’ll send our sacks to proper endpoints like junkshops and recyclers. Let’s please move before the morning sun gets too hot.”
Around 30 people from the local barangays of Tingloy, plus a contingent from the Philippine Coast Guard, have gathered along the shores of Barangay Marikaban to retrieve sachets, plastic bottles, bottle caps, ropes and anything that doesn’t naturally belong here.
Like everyone, I’ve been given a red mesh sack and assigned to pick up every plastic or foil sachet I see. I don’t have to look hard – the little suckers are literally coating every meter of this beach.

The Problem of Plastic
Plastics revolutionized the world: they’re inexpensive, durable, nonporous, lightweight and have a million uses. They’re so tough that most will never be fully broken down by nature. Instead, they’ll photodegrade into tiny particles called microplastics. It takes some 400 years – around 13 human generations – for this to happen.
The problem is that too many plastics are designed to be used only once. Many of the world’s third-world economies are built on a tingi-tingi culture where daily needs are bought on daily wages.
Single-use plastics like sachets, sando bags, straws, diapers and bottles account for half the plastics made today.
A report from the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA) released in 2019 revealed that Pinoys used 163 million plastic sachets, 48 million sando bags and 45 million labo bags daily. The World Bank in turn estimated that the country generated 2.7 million tons of plastic waste yearly, 20% of which ends up in our oceans.

Global studies about plastics gauged that humanity has produced 8.3 billion metric tons of plastic, 75% or 6.3 billion metric tons of which have become plastic waste. There’s so much of it that scientists have proposed this era to officially be termed the Anthropocene, a slice of time marked on the fossil record not by fossilized bones, but nonbiodegradable plastic.
Our oceans can only absorb so much. Sea turtles and whales now mistake translucent plastic bags for jellyfish, while pelagic fish swallow gleaming microplastics mistaken for plankton. Distant islands – from icebergs in the Arctic to uninhabited sandbars in the Pacific – are plastic-ridden. Even the most remote part of our planet, the Mariana Trench at over 10 kilometers deep, is littered with yesteryear’s grocery bags.
“We cannot keep ignoring the plastic problem, especially here in Tingloy,” says Pia Roxas Ocampo, founder of Pure Oceans, a marine conservation social enterprise. The Philippines is part of the Coral Triangle, where marine diversity levels are unparalleled. The Verde Island Passage, which includes Tingloy, has long been hailed as the epicenter for marine shorefish diversity.

Threat to Marine Biodiversity
Since 2018, Pure Oceans has been working with local communities in Tingloy to recover plastic profitably. “In truth, coastal cleanups like this aren’t long-term solutions,” adds Pia, picking up trash along with everyone. “These are simply emergency measures to protect the coral reefs that surround this island. These reefs aren’t just great dive sites – they sustain the livelihoods of people here.”
Plastics, whether whole or broken down into microplastics, threaten marine diversity. It’s not uncommon to see old fishing nets snagged onto coral heads, or undigested plastic in the guts of the seafood we eat.
“Microplastics concentrate and encapsulate pollutants. They’re dangerous when ingested by fish or other animals,” explains Dr. Wilfredo Licuanan, a coral expert and University Fellow at De La Salle University. “Plastics don’t just smother corals either. They can cause injuries, which increases the likelihood of corals getting sick.”
For the past seven years, Pure Oceans has been working with public and private sector partners – from the municipal government to corporations and local communities – to develop practical ways to collect and divert plastic away from coral reefs.
“We’re known as the MRF Angels because we buy hand-washed plastic and foil strips from selected participants at PHP20 per kilogram,” shares Princess Aldovino, busily filling up her sack with little plastic bottle-caps. “Tons of plastic and foil have been brought to our MRF or Materials Recovery Facility and they are used as ‘pluffing’ or ‘plastic-stuffing’ for various products locally made in Tingloy. We support several senior citizens who help convert trash into useful raw materials.”
After an hour’s work and with my mesh bag finally bursting with sachets (my wife Ngoc collected even more sachets than me), I trudge back to our collection point. Tak and Lai Manalo from Pure Oceans measure the morning’s haul: nearly 175 kilos of plastic waste, among them a cellphone, a syringe, a rubber duckie, gambling dice and some truly scary plastic dolls.

Soon we visit Caban Cove, a popular dive site. Diving here decades ago, I vividly recall having lunch in a spotless white sand beach. Now, it is covered end-to-end with broken branches, coconut husks and you guessed it, plastic. Pia and I carefully examine the debris.
“Coastal cleanups help, but each day will deposit a brand-new layer of trash. With the local community of Tingloy, we’ve developed and tested solutions to help other islands address the plastic problem,” she explains.
“We’re working on all aspects of the garbage lifecycle – from implementing corporations’ extender producer responsibility, CSR projects, developing waste management systems with local governments, environmental education for schools, plus physical cleanups along our coasts. After seven years of learning, we’re ready to replicate our solutions nationwide – but we need more partners.”
We pick through more layers of refuse. I dig out a twisted piece of seaglass, keeping it as a reminder that some things just don’t belong in the big blue. “For many Pinoys, conserving the oceans starts at home. Thinking before buying and properly segregating our waste might just prevent trash from ending up here,” gestures Pia.
We leave the area after a day’s work. Though spiritually satisfied, we barely made a dent in the tidal wave of plastics assailing the quiet island paradise. Despite this, it’s still rung with corals, still teeming with fish.
Two hundred million metric tons of single-use plastics will be produced this year, equivalent to 10 million fully-loaded dump trucks.
How many tons will end up at sea? How many new layers of trash will be added to the beaches of Tingloy and the world’s other islands?
Travel
Checking the London Underground
UK’s London Underground serves millions every day, an example of a working train system (that we do not have in the Philippines). Sadly, 1 in 5 LGBTQIA+ travelers experience crime while using it, and 65% did not merit support from bystanders.

One way for Filipinos who are able to travel overseas can tell how bad our public transport system is, is by comparing the trains. We were invaded by White people in 1521, but – even now – we still only have three train lines.
@outragemag Check #LondonUnderground #trains in #London, aware it could be unsafe for #LGBT ♬ original sound – Outrage Magazine
UK, as an example, has the London Underground. Managed by Transport for London, this started in 1863 as the world’s first underground passenger railway. It now has 11 lines with 250 miles (400 kilometers) of track, with its 272 stations serving around five million passengers every day.
This isn’t a perfect system. Obviously, this is London-centric. It only serves the Greater London area, and some parts of the adjacent counties of Buckinghamshire, Essex and Hertfordshire in England. This is like saying na wala ngang LRT or MRT sa Bulacan o Cavite o Antipolo eh, and this lack highlights the exclusion of those also in need of proper public transport.
Looking at London’s train system through the LGBTQIA+ lens is actually disheartening… particularly if we talk not only about possibly meeting booking while riding trains. In 2023, London TravelWatch released a report that revealed that when LGBTQIA+ people used public transport:
- One in five (21%) experienced hate crime in the past year while travelling on public transport in London
- Four in five (82%) respondents changed their behavior or appearance to ‘fit in’ so they avoid abuse or harassment when travelling
- 65% of those who experienced abuse or harm when travelling in London said bystanders witnessed the incident but did not intervene







Lesson learned lang din: that even in spaces that better people’s lives, like a working train system, there are minority sectors that could be disadvantaged. And so this must always be considered to make sure all spaces are truly inclusive.
But off we go for more LGBTQIA+ rampa…
Destinations
London has The Monument to remember the fire that destroyed the city, but failed to learn lessons from what happened
Do you know of the #GreatFireOfLondon? #London has a monument for that but some anti-minority (including #LGBT) lessons are not learned.

In London in 1666, fire broke somewhere in Pudding Lane, with the blaze raging for days to – basically – gut the medieval City of London inside the old Roman city wall, though eventually extending past the wall to the west of London, and then swallowing almost the entire city.
@outragemag Heard of #GreatFireOfLondon before? #London has #TheMonument for that even if anti-minority (including #LGBT ♬ original sound – Outrage Magazine
The death toll, or yung dami ng namatay, is still contested even now. But some things are generally accepted as true, including:
- How the fire started in the bakeshop of the king’s baker, Thomas Farriner. So he is now eternally blamed for the fire, kahit na baka naman nakatulog lang siya dahil sa pagod sa trabaho. His boss nga eh, the king, did not know a single day of work because his position of power and wealth that came with it were inherited.
- The mayor at that time, Thomas Bloodworth, actually hesitated to make moves to stop the fire, though this is something we already expect from our politicians who – surprise, surprise – still manage to get elected anyway.
- There was blaming of the “others”, including immigrants, homeless people, and so on for causing the fire; this blaming of non-Whites is still common in the UK even now, even if the real abusers are those in positions of power as they make us fight among each other while they live in abundance.
Anyway, to commemorate what they now call as the Great Fire of London, and to mark na rin the rebuilding that followed, they established the Monument to the Great Fire of London. Also called as The Monument, it’s at the junction of Monument Street and Fish Street Hill.
Designed by Robert Hooke, and completed in 1677, The Monument is a column built of Portland stone, with a gilded urn of fire topping it. There is a viewing platform near the top, na ma-a-access through a narrow winding staircase of 311 steps.










Sa Pilipinas, wala nga tayong great fire, but we have the never-ending ultra-great floods. Our politicians don’t care, too, focusing sa pagpapayaman through nakaw. But we don’t have markers; instead, we just have ruined lives. So yung lessons all the way from 1666, all the way from London, walang nakakarinig, as we all just look at the monuments and not their lessons…
But off we go for more #LGBTQIA+ rampa…
The Monument is located at the junction of Monument Street and Fish Street Hill in the City of London.
Destinations
Your idea of the ‘London Bridge’ is false… thanks to erroneous marketing pandering to our lookism
If you think of the #LondonBridge’, the idea that emerges is the #TowerBridge, thanks to our #lookism abused by misdirected #branding #marketing. Discovered during this #LGBT wandering.

There’s a phenomenon called the Paradox of Information, wherein – surprisingly – the abundance of information actually leads to poorer decision-making because of reduced intelligence because of the superficial understanding of complex issues.
So while you can Google information, comprehension is a completely different matter altogether.
Case in point? The London Bridge in England.
@outragemag Did you know there are 2 #London bridges? The popular #LondonBridge is the #TowerBridge, discovered during this #LGBT #travel ♬ original sound Outrage Magazine
So… for those who do not know, the image associated with the London Bridge is actually the Tower Bridge. Erroneous linking lang due to branding; that is, the London Bridge may be the most famous bridge in London, but the bridge that has been used to promote London is a different bridge altogether, the Tower Bridge.
Magkatabi lang sila; they’re near each other, along River Thames.
London Bridge is the oldest river crossing in London, and mahaba ang history nito.
Timber bridges were built by the Romans over 600 years ago. This was followed by a 600-year-old stone-built bridge. Then there’s the 19th century stone arched bridge designed by Scottish civil engineer John Rennie. Then the concrete and steel bridge in use today was opened by the late Queen Elizabeth II in 1973.
The thing is: this bridge may be historical, but it looks common.
Which is why you don’t see it in movies or postcards or socmed uploads and so on.








Instead, you see the Tower Bridge.
This one was built in 1894, with a Neo-Gothic design that blends with the Tower of London. This was designed by Sir Horace Jones, and helped implemented by Sir John Wolfe Barry.
So eto na nga… there are some lessons to be learned here:
- Just because we think we know, doesn’t mean we do.
- That ang laki ng impact ng marketing sa buhay natin, changing the ways we perceive the world.
- That we can all be lookist; mas sikat ang mas maganda, even if mas historical ang di kagandahan.
- And yet… we can learn naman.
So off we go pa for more #LGBTQIA+ rampa…
-
NewsMakers3 weeks ago
Understanding hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
-
Pet Care3 weeks ago
Back-to-school season can be ruff on pets
-
NewsMakers3 weeks ago
Plant-based nutrient improves immune cells’ ability to fight cancer
-
Home Care3 weeks ago
Explore the benefits of a bathroom upgrade
-
Nutrition3 weeks ago
Protein-packed sweet treats
-
Nutrition3 weeks ago
Power your summer with 100% orange juice
-
Destinations2 weeks ago
Finding Neverland in London
-
NewsMakers3 weeks ago
Forget materialism, a simple life is happier: research