Connect with us

NewsMakers

Young adults at highest risk of weight gain

People aged 18 to 24 were four times more likely to become overweight or develop obesity over the next 10 years than those aged 65 to 74. Young adults classed as overweight or obese were also more likely to move to a higher BMI category (from the overweight category to obesity or from non-severe obesity to severe obesity) than those classed as overweight or with obesity in any other age group.

Published

on

Photo by Diana Polekhina from Unsplash.com

Young adults aged 18 to 24 are at the highest risk of becoming overweight or developing obesity in the next decade of their life compared to adults in any other age group, and obesity prevention policies should target this group, according to a new study led by researchers at UCL (University College London), the University of Cambridge, and Berlin Institute of Health at Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin (BIH).

The study, published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, found that being a young adult is a more important risk factor for weight gain than sex, ethnicity, geographic region, or socioeconomic area characteristics. The risk of gaining weight is not only highest in the youngest adult age group, but it steadily decreases with age.

The researchers looked at anonymised primary care health records from more than 2 million adults (with more than 9 million measurements of BMI and weight) in England between 1998 and 2016 to investigate the risk of weight changes at different ages and among different groups.

They found that people aged 18 to 24 were four times more likely to become overweight or develop obesity over the next 10 years than those aged 65 to 74. Young adults classed as overweight or obese were also more likely to move to a higher BMI category (from the overweight category to obesity or from non-severe obesity to severe obesity) than those classed as overweight or with obesity in any other age group.

The authors provide the public (for the first time) an online tool to calculate their risk of weight change over the next 1, 5, and 10 years based on an individual’s current weight and height, age, sex, ethnicity and socioeconomic area characteristics. 

Lead author Dr Michail Katsoulis (UCL Institute of Health Informatics) said: “Our results show clearly that age is the most important sociodemographic factor for BMI change. Young people aged 18 to 24 have the highest risk of BMI gain, compared to older people. We also found that among individuals with obesity, those aged between 35 and 54 had the highest risk of not losing weight compared to other adults.”

Co-senior author Dr Claudia Langenberg (MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, and Berlin Institute of Health) said: “Young people go through big life changes. They may start work, go to university or leave home for the first time – the habits they form in these years may stick through adulthood. If we are serious about preventing obesity, then we should develop interventions that can be targeted and are relevant for young adults.”

In the study, the risks of moving to a higher BMI category over 10 years were 4-6 times higher in the youngest (18–24 years) than the oldest (65–74 years) age group. People aged 18-24 were 4.2 times more likely than people aged 65-74 to transition from normal weight to overweight/obesity, were 4.6 times more likely to transition from the overweight category to obesity and 5.9 times more likely to move from non-severe obesity to severe obesity. The link between sociodemographic factors such as deprivation and ethnicity and these transitions was less pronounced.

For example, the risk of transitioning from overweight to obesity over 10 years for white men with a BMI of 26 (weight 87kg, height 1.82m) varies substantially according to age: the risks are 40%, 25%, 22%, 18%, 13% and 10% for individuals aged 18-24, 25-34 35-44, 45-54, 55-64 and 65-74 years respectively. The researchers were surprised to see only a small additional effect of social deprivation on risks of weight gain.  In the example above, the risk of the youngest men living in the most deprived areas was 44% compared to 40% in average areas).

The study used data from 400 primary care centres. Participants were aged 18 to 74 and had had their weight and BMI measured at their general practice on more than one occasion between 1998 and 2016. Researchers looked at changes in BMI after one year, five years and 10 years, calculating the likelihood of moving between weight categories (underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese) at different ages and in different groups.

Professor Hemingway said: “Health systems, like the NHS, need to identify new ways to prevent obesity and its consequences.  This study demonstrates that NHS data collected over time in primary care holds an important key to unlocking new insights for public health action.”

NewsMakers

Common drug class may increase risk of heart disease

The risk of cardiovascular disease increased in line with how much anticholinergic medication the participants used each year. Those with the highest exposure had a 71 per cent higher risk of a cardiovascular event than people who did not use anticholinergic medication at all.

Published

on

People who use drugs with anticholinergic effects, including certain antidepressants, drugs for urinary incontinence and common antihistamines, are at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease.

This is shown in a study from Karolinska Institutet published in BMC Medicine.

Anticholinergic drugs reduce the effect of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine and are commonly prescribed to middle-aged and older people. This large group of drugs includes antihistamines used for allergic conditions, anxiety or insomnia, drugs for urinary incontinence, and certain antidepressants, where tricyclic antidepressants have a strong anticholinergic effect, whereas SSRIs have a weaker effect. A high cumulative use of these drugs, referred to as anticholinergic burden (see fact box), has previously been linked to impaired cognitive ability. 

May affect heart regulation 

The new study suggests that the drugs may also affect the parasympathetic nervous system and thereby the regulation of the cardiovascular system. The results show that it may be important to monitor the total drug burden in everyday clinical practice.

The study included more than 500,000 people in Stockholm, Sweden, who were 45 years of age or older and had no prior cardiovascular disease, except for hypertension, at the start of the study. The researchers followed the participants for up to 14 years and analysed how the use of anticholinergic drugs was associated with the development of cardiovascular disease.

“Many of these drugs are used by older people and by people with multiple medical conditions. We wanted to investigate whether the total exposure had any significance for the risk of developing cardiovascular disease over time,” says Nanbo Zhu, postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet.

71 per cent higher cardiac risk

The study showed that the risk of cardiovascular disease increased in line with how much anticholinergic medication the participants used each year. Those with the highest exposure had a 71 per cent higher risk of a cardiovascular event than people who did not use anticholinergic medication at all. The association was seen for all types of cardiovascular disease but was particularly clear for heart failure and various forms of arrhythmia.

“Our results indicate that the cumulative drug burden can affect heart regulation, not only in the short term but also over the long term. This does not mean that the drugs should always be avoided, but that exposure should be monitored carefully,” says Hong Xu, assistant professor at the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society.

The researchers point out that the study is observational, meaning it cannot establish a causal relationship. Other factors, such as underlying diseases, may also influence the associations.

The work was carried out within the Stockholm CREAtinine Measurements project in collaboration between several research groups at Karolinska Institutet and Region Stockholm. The study was funded by the Swedish Research Council, the Center for Innovative Medicine Foundation, and other foundations. Some researchers report assignments for the pharmaceutical industry, which are disclosed in the scientific publication.

Continue Reading

NewsMakers

Mindfulness practices found to significantly reduce depression symptoms, especially for those with early-life adversity

Mindfulness interventions help by regulating our emotions better when different challenges come up. For someone who has experienced childhood neglect or abuse, mindfulness training can help us make sense of that and respond skillfully to this moment in time.

Published

on

A new study reveals that mindfulness practices may significantly reduce depression symptoms, particularly in people who have experienced early-life adversity, such as childhood abuse and neglect.

Led by Eric Loucks, professor of medicine, epidemiology, and of behavioral and social sciences and director of the Mindfulness Center at Brown, the study enrolled 201 participants, 101 of whom were randomized into the Mindfulness-Based Blood Pressure Reduction Program, while 100 were randomized into an enhanced usual care control, which included home blood-pressure monitors, physician access and health-education materials. Researchers also had a measure of participants’ early-life adversity, particularly their exposure to abuse or neglect.

Loucks and his team followed participants for six months to assess changes in blood pressure, health behaviors and mental health, finding that those in the mindfulness program showed significant improvements in their depression symptoms. Additionally, participants who experienced childhood neglect showed greater improvements in depression symptoms than those who had not. A similar, though less pronounced, trend was observed among people with a history of childhood abuse.

“In this program, that was primarily designed to lower blood pressure while addressing whole-person health, we also saw that mental well-being, particularly around depression symptoms, improved in participants that went through the program,” Loucks said. “The findings suggest that cultivating mindful self-regulation skills–such such as self-awareness, attention control and emotion regulation–may help interrupt maladaptive patterns shaped by past experiences.”

Over the last 15 years, Loucks has been studying social determinants of health such as early-life adversity and its impacts on cardiovascular health, body mass index and blood pressure. “I came to a point where I wanted to not just document it, but do something about it, and I wondered if mindfulness training might help,” he said. “I’d gone through a lot of mindfulness training myself outside of work and started to get trained up in mindfulness programs that are specific to health contexts.”

Loucks began to study the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program, running it through two clinical trials that were funded by the NIH and finding that it reduced blood pressure in both trials. He also wanted to look at the intervention from a whole-person perspective.

“If we look at everyday folks out in the world, those that had exposure to early life adversity, like abuse and neglect, tend to have worse mental health and also worse cardiovascular health,” Loucks said. “Mindfulness interventions help by regulating our emotions better when different challenges come up. For someone who has experienced childhood neglect or abuse, mindfulness training can help us make sense of that and respond skillfully to this moment in time.” 

Loucks discussed this work during a keynote address at the U.S. DOHaD Society this year. “It felt like a coming-home moment to see that this intervention, originally developed to address psychosocial factors that influence health, had even stronger effects among people with early-life adversity, particularly on depression,” he said. “It’s been about a 15-year arc of research that culminated in these findings.”

Continue Reading

NewsMakers

High-fiber diet linked to reduced risk of heart disease in night shift workers

A moderate intake of about 19 grams of fibre per day was linked to a lower risk for those who worked night shifts regularly. For those who worked night shifts sporadically, about 15 grams was enough. The current recommendation for adults is about 25 grams of dietary fibre per day.

Published

on

People who work at night have a higher risk of coronary artery disease, a type of heart disease. A new study suggests that a higher fibre intake in the diet may help reduce this risk. The study included over 220,000 adults in the UK and is published in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

The human body is built to sleep at night. This means that working during the night goes against this natural pattern, and can place additional strain on the body, including the heart. Previous research has linked night work to an increased risk of coronary artery disease. Since night work is often unavoidable, the researchers wanted to investigate whether certain dietary habits might have a protective effect.

More fibre associated with lower risk

The researchers used data from 220,000 adults in the UK Biobank (2006–2010) and divided the participants into three groups:

  • Day workers
  • Shift workers who worked night shifts sporadically
  • Regular night shift workers

The participants had completed a detailed questionnaire about their dietary habits. During a follow-up after about 12 years, it was found that night shift workers who consumed little fibre in their diet had a higher risk of coronary artery disease than those who consumed more fibre.

“A moderate intake of about 19 grams of fibre per day was linked to a lower risk for those who worked night shifts regularly. For those who worked night shifts sporadically, about 15 grams was enough. The current recommendation for adults is about 25 grams of dietary fibre per day,” says Diana Nôga, lead author and researcher at Uppsala University.

The researchers stress that the figures from the study are not official dietary recommendations. But they do show a pattern in this UK study: a higher dietary fibre intake was linked to a lower risk of heart disease among night shift workers.

“The link between fibre and a lower risk of heart disease is not just because those who eat more fibre generally have a healthier lifestyle. We know this because we adjusted for various lifestyle factors in the analysis. One possible explanation, supported by previous research, is that fibre in the diet can improve intestinal flora and also reduce lipids, which can be particularly good for the heart in people who work at night,” says Christian Benedict, senior author of the study and Professor of Pharmacology at Uppsala University.

Dietary fibre can support heart health

According to the researchers, an increased intake of fibre-rich foods such as whole grains, vegetables, fruit, legumes and lentils may be a simple way to improve heart health for night shift workers. However, this requires that you do not have any medical obstacles to doing this, such as chronic gastrointestinal diseases.

“Dietary changes should be seen as a complement to, not a substitute for, other heart health-promoting habits such as not smoking, remaining physically active, and getting enough sleep,” says Diana Nôga.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Like Us On Facebook

Loading...

Most Popular

Copyright ©FRINGE PUBLISHING. All rights reserved.