Connect with us

NewsMakers

For teens, outdoor recreation during the pandemic linked to improved well-being

Outdoor play and nature-based activities helped buffer some of the negative mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic for adolescents.

Published

on

Photo by Kelly Sikkema from Unsplash.com

A study from North Carolina State University found outdoor play and nature-based activities helped buffer some of the negative mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic for adolescents.

Researchers said the findings, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, point to outdoor play and nature-based activities as a tool to help teenagers cope with major stressors like the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as future natural disasters and other global stressors. Researchers also underscore the mental health implications of restricting outdoor recreation opportunities for adolescents, and the need to increase access to the outdoors.

“Families should be encouraged that building patterns in outdoor recreation can give kids tools to weather the storms to come,” said Kathryn Stevenson, a study co-author and assistant professor of parks, recreation and tourism management at NC State. “Things happen in life, and getting kids outside regularly is an easy way to build some mental resilience.”

In the survey, conducted from April 30 to June 15, 2020, researchers asked 624 adolescents between the ages of 10 to 18 years to report their participation in outdoor recreation both before the pandemic and after social distancing measures were in effect across the United States. They also asked adolescents about their subjective well-being, a measure of happiness, and mental health.

The findings revealed the pandemic had an impact on the well-being of many teens in the survey, with nearly 52 percent of adolescents reporting declines in subjective well-being. They also saw declines in teens’ ability to get outside, with 64 percent of adolescents reporting their outdoor activity participation fell during the early months of the pandemic. Despite these declines in outdoor activity participation, nearly 77 percent of teens surveyed believed that spending time outside helped them deal with stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We know that a lot of outdoor activities that kids engage in happen during school, in youth sports leagues or clubs, and those things got put on hold during the pandemic,” said the study’s lead author Brent Jackson, a graduate student in the Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Program at NC State. “Based on our study, they were getting outside less – we think not being in school and having those activities really contributed to that.”

When they broke down recreation by type, they saw participation in outdoor play activities such as sports, biking, going for walks, runs or skating declined by 41.6 percent, nature-based activities such as camping, hiking, fishing, hunting, and paddling dropped by 39.7 percent, and outdoor family activities declined by 28.6 percent. In those early months of the pandemic, about 60 percent of teens said they were able to get outside once a week or less.

“We saw declines in all three types of outdoor recreation participation,” Jackson said. “Nature-based activities had the lowest participation before and during the pandemic, which may point to the need for more access to natural spaces in general.”

Results showed that well-being and outdoor recreation trends were linked, and the negative trends they saw during the pandemic for well-being and participation in outdoor recreation were seen regardless of teens’ race, gender, age, income community type or geographic region. Kids who did not get outside as much saw declines in well-being, but those who got outside both before and during the pandemic were able to maintain higher levels of well-being.

“This tells us that outdoor recreation can promote well-being for kids when it happens, and can potentially take away from well-being when it doesn’t,” Stevenson said.

Teens who had high rates of outdoor play before the pandemic were more resistant to negative changes in social well-being. Those who got outside frequently before the pandemic were more likely to experience a lesser decline in well-being, regardless of participation during the pandemic. And, for teens who were able to play outside or get involved in nature-based activities during the pandemic, their well-being was on par with pre-pandemic levels.

“Kids who were able to continue participating in outdoor play and nature-based activities had subjective well-being levels that were similar to what they were before the pandemic, but kids who weren’t able to participate saw much greater declines,” Jackson said.

The study’s findings also point to strategies to help kids navigate future global stressor events, as well as the importance of ensuring access to outdoor recreation. They help define the risks associated with policies that reduce kids’ ability get outside.

“Going outside and participating in activities that provide exposure to nature, physical activity and safe social interaction during the pandemic were really powerful in terms of improving kids’ resilience,” Jackson said.

The study, “Outdoor Activity Participation Improves Adolescents’ Mental Health and Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. In addition to Jackson and Stevenson, other authors included Lincoln R. Larson, M. Nils Peterson and Erin Seekamp.

Zest Magazine accepts contributions promoting everything about living the good life (and how to make this so). C'mon, give us a yell.

NewsMakers

Heart disease risk may start in the womb, study finds

Young adults whose mothers had high blood pressure during pregnancy — either pregnancy-associated hypertension, pre-eclampsia or eclampsia — had more signs of early arterial injury, higher blood pressure, higher body mass index and higher blood sugar than peers.

Published

on

A child’s future heart health may be partially shaped before they are born, reports a new Northwestern Medicine study that found pregnancy complications are linked to poorer cardiovascular health in offspring more than 20 years later.

The study found that young adults whose mothers had high blood pressure during pregnancy — either pregnancy-associated hypertension, pre-eclampsia or eclampsia — had more signs of early arterial injury, higher blood pressure, higher body mass index and higher blood sugar than peers.

The authors said the study adds to growing evidence that cardiovascular risk may be transmitted across generations through a combination of biological, environmental and behavioral factors.

“That means we must make sure people maintain good health from childhood into young adulthood, so that if or when someone becomes a parent, they pass on the best opportunity for good health to their children,” said study senior author Dr. Nilay Shah, assistant professor of medicine in the division of cardiology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

How the study was conducted

Shah and colleagues evaluated nearly 1,350 mother-child pairs from the Future of Families and Child Well-Being Study, which enrolled mothers and children at birth between 1998 and 2000 across 20 U.S. cities. The children were then followed into adulthood.

Using delivery hospitalization records, the Northwestern scientists first identified whether mothers experienced pregnancy complications, including high blood pressure during pregnancy, gestational diabetes (high blood sugar during pregnancy) or preterm birth (before 37 weeks of pregnancy).

The three pregnancy complications are on the rise, and affect almost one in four pregnancies in the U.S.

The research team then analyzed cardiovascular health of offspring at age 22, using blood pressure measurements, blood testing, body mass index assessments and carotid artery ultrasounds to look for signs of artery injury.

Finally, the scientists compared participants with and without exposure to each pregnancy complication and adjusted for factors like income, education, difference in birth weight and smoking during pregnancy.

Key findings

At around age 22, participants whose mothers had high blood pressure during pregnancy had:

  • Higher body mass index (+2.8 BMI points)
  • Higher diastolic blood pressure (+2.3 mm Hg)
  • Higher blood sugar levels (+0.2% HbA1c)
  • Thicker artery walls (~0.02 mm)

While the difference in artery wall thickness may seem small, the study authors said it corresponds to roughly three to five years of additional vascular aging. That means arteries looked older and less healthy than expected, which raises the risk of future heart disease.

Other pregnancy complications also showed some long-term effect:

  • Exposure to gestational diabetes was linked to worse blood pressure and some evidence of artery thickening
  • Being born preterm was associated with higher blood sugar levels

‘Most heart disease is preventable’

With pregnancy complications on the rise in the U.S., Shah said the study provides compelling evidence that improving health before and during pregnancy could help reduce heart disease risk in the next generation.

“There is evidence that both parents’ health at the time of conception and during pregnancy influences a child’s health,” he said. “So, promoting health from an early age, like exercising regularly, eating healthfully, never smoking and getting enough sleep, is not just meant for an individual, but doing so may help future generations be healthier, too.”

Shah also emphasizes that risk is not destiny.

“The good news is that most heart disease is preventable,” he said. “If you experienced high blood pressure or high blood sugar during pregnancy, or your child was born early, it does not absolutely mean that your child will have worse health as adults. But I would encourage you to pay attention now to your child’s health behaviors.

“What children learn in childhood sets the stage for their health across their lives. If you are wondering whether your children’s behaviors are healthy, or are considering making a change, please speak with your child’s pediatrician for advice and guidance.”

Other Northwestern co-authors include Emily Lam, Abigail Gauen, Dr. Sadiya Khan, Alexa Freedman and Norrina Allen.

Continue Reading

NewsMakers

Viagra could hold key to halting Peyronie’s disease

Combining two widely prescribed drug classes could provide the first effective treatment for early-stage Peyronie’s disease.

Published

on

Combining two widely prescribed drug classes could provide the first effective treatment for early-stage Peyronie’s disease, according to a study published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine.

Peyronie’s disease (PD) is caused by the development of fibrotic scar tissue within the penis, leading to pain, curvature, sexual dysfunction and, in many cases, significant psychological distress. It affects an estimated 10 per cent of men during their lifetime, but despite its prevalence, treatment options are limited, particularly in the early phase of the condition.

The study, carried out by Anglia Ruskin University (ARU) and University College London Hospital (UCLH), found that combining phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors such as sildenafil (Viagra) and tadalafil (Cialis) with selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), including tamoxifen, may slow or even stop disease progression when given early.

The clinical study, carried out by Professor David Ralph of UCLH, evaluated outcomes in 133 men diagnosed with acute Peyronie’s disease who were treated with the drug combination for three months. Their results were compared with a smaller group of patients receiving standard care, which included giving vitamin E or no treatment at all. Standard care did not include surgery.

The study found 43 per cent of patients on the combination experienced an improvement in penile curvature, almost three times higher than in the standard‑care group (15 per cent).

At the start of treatment, 65 per cent of patients in the combination group reported pain during erections. After three months, that figure had fallen to just 1.5 per cent. By comparison, pain prevalence in the standard‑care group fell from 50 per cent to 27 per cent.

The clinical findings build on earlier laboratory work led by Professor Selim Cellek at ARU’s Fibrosis Research Group. Over the course of several years, Professor Cellek’s team screened 1,953 FDA‑approved drugs to identify compounds capable of blocking the transformation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, the key cells responsible for fibrosis. PDE5 inhibitors and SERMs emerged as particularly effective, and when used together demonstrated an effect greater than either drug alone.

Currently, there are no approved oral therapies proven to prevent early disease progression, forcing patients in the acute phase to wait until the condition stabilises before they can be offered treatments including injections or surgery.

Professor Cellek said: “Positive findings from this pilot clinical study validate our drug‑screening approach in the lab. It shows how repurposing well‑known medicines can accelerate progress in areas of unmet clinical need.

“Because both PDE5 inhibitors and SERMs are already widely used in clinical practice and have established safety profiles, the approach could be readily adoptable if confirmed in larger studies.

“These results suggest that early intervention targeting fibrosis could change how we treat Peyronie’s disease. Repurposing existing drugs may allow us to move from managing symptoms to modifying the disease itself.”

Professor David Ralph, Professor of Urology at UCLH, said: “This paper confirms the basic science research with regards to halting the progression of Peyronie’s disease. In previous papers we have noted that tamoxifen and PDE5 inhibitors inhibit the transformation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts and therefore contraction of the plaque.

“This has now been put into clinical practice where this paper shows that when tamoxifen and a PDE5 inhibitor are combined, there is statistically less progression of the disease and improvement in curvature compared to the control arm. This is where from bench to clinical practice prevails and hopefully now a prospective clinical trial can be initiated.”

Continue Reading

NewsMakers

Healthier brains may be more resilient to early Alzheimer’s disease

Maintaining good overall brain health may help reduce the impact of Alzheimer’s‑related changes on cognitive function.

Published

on

A healthy brain may help protect thinking and memory skills from the early effects of Alzheimer’s disease, a new study has found.

Dementia is currently the leading cause of death in Australia and Alzheimer’s disease is its most common form — accounting for more than 70% of cases.

Alzheimer’s is a progressive brain disease in which cognitive abilities gradually decline, leading to impaired memory and thinking skills.

However, some people maintain high levels of cognitive function even though their brains show early signs of the disease. Specifically, some older adults have Alzheimer’s‑related brain pathology, but no noticeable cognitive problems.

The study, Cognitive and Brain Reserve as Modifiers of Early Alzheimer Disease–Related Cognitive Vulnerability, was a collaboration between Murdoch University and AdventHealth, and investigated why some people remain cognitively healthy despite early Alzheimer’s‑related brain changes.

“Our study looked at why some brains were more resilient than others, and whether factors such as peoples’ education, socioeconomic status and health of their brain made a difference,” said lead author Dr Kelsey Sewell, from Murdoch University’s School of Allied Health.

“Understanding these protective factors could help us develop earlier and more targeted strategies to minimise the effects of the disease on memory and thinking skills,” she said.

The research team analysed data from more than 600 older adults in the United States aged 65 to 80, who were living independently and had no signs of dementia or memory impairment.

They used blood tests and MRI scans to assess early Alzheimer’s‑related changes and overall brain health, examined life and social factors such as years of education, income, savings and financial security, and conducted cognitive tests measuring memory, attention, processing speed, working memory and executive function.

“Our main finding was that maintaining good overall brain health may help reduce the impact of Alzheimer’s‑related changes on cognitive function,” Dr Sewell said.

“We also observed early evidence that people with a higher socioeconomic status may be less affected by Alzheimer’s-related changes when it comes to memory, although more research is needed to confirm this relationship.”

Dr Sewell said the main takeaway for the public was to do everything you can to maintain a healthy brain.

“Things like exercise, maintaining a healthy diet, sleeping well, and finding new cognitive challenges can help to maintain a healthy brain. It is never too late, or too early to start,” she said .

“These results underscore the need for coordinated action across research, policy, and industry to design environments that support healthier choices and promote brain health at a population level.”

The data collection for this study was led by researchers at AdventHealth in Orlando, Florida.

The paper, Cognitive and Brain Reserve as Modifiers of Early Alzheimer Disease–Related Cognitive Vulnerability, was published in the journal Neurology.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Like Us On Facebook

Loading...

Most Popular

Copyright ©FRINGE PUBLISHING. All rights reserved.