NewsMakers
Heavy stress and lifestyle can predict how long we live
The life expectancy of the whole population could be improved significantly through helping men and people with a lower level of education, in particular, make better lifestyle choices.
Life expectancy is influenced not only by the traditional lifestyle-related risk factors but also by factors related to a person’s quality of life, such as heavy stress. The biggest causes for shortened life expectancy for 30-year-old men are smoking and diabetes. Smoking takes 6.6 years and diabetes 6.5 years out of their life expectancy. Being under heavy stress shortens their life expectancy by 2.8 years.
These results are based on a study in which researchers from the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare calculated the effects of multiple risk factors, including lifestyle-related ones, to the life expectancy of men and women.
The study also revealed that a lack of exercise strongly reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men – by 2.4 years. On the other hand, things such as the consumption of plenty of fruits and vegetables could increase life expectancy: eating fruit by 1.4 years and eating vegetables by 0.9 years.
The same factors impacted the life expectancy of both men and women. For 30-year-old women, e.g. smoking shortened the life expectancy by 5.5 years, diabetes by 5.3 years, and heavy stress by 2.3 years.
The effects to the life expectancy of older people were similar but smaller than in younger age groups.
The golden middle seemed to have the most positive effect in some factors related to lifestyle. The experience of stress increased the life expectancy if the person felt the amount of stress they had was approximately the same as what other people typically experienced. Having more or less stress than that, on the other hand, reduced their life expectancy.
A new calculation method in use for a large group of risk factors for the first time
The study was based on data collected from men and women aged 25 to 74 in the Finnish National FINRISK Study 1987-2007 through questionnaires and measurements. The rate of mortality was followed until the end of 2014.
The researchers calculated the life expectancies by changing the values of each risk factor at a time and keeping the values of other factors constant. Only the BMI, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels were allowed to be changed when the values related to lifestyle factors were changed.
“Before, life expectancy has usually been assessed based on only a few sociodemographic background factor groups, such as age, sex, and education. In this study, we wanted to assess the impact of several different factors to a person’s life expectancy, so we could compare their effects,” says Research Manager Tommi Härkänen.
Differences between the life expectancies of men and women largely due to risk factors that can be changed
“What was interesting about the study was how small the difference in the life expectancy of 30-year men and women was based on the same risk factor values – only 1.6 years. According to the statistics from Statistics Finland, the difference between the sexes has been over five years for all 30-year-olds, which comes down to women having healthier lifestyles than men,” says Research Professor Seppo Koskinen.
In this study, the differences in the life expectancies of people with different levels of education were fairly small when the other risk factor values were the same. However, earlier studies have discovered large differences between the life expectancies of groups of people with different levels of education.
The lifestyle choices that increase mortality, such as smoking, heavy alcohol use, unhealthy diet, and lack of exercise, are most common in the population groups whose social position is the weakest.
The life expectancy of the whole population could be improved significantly through helping men and people with a lower level of education, in particular, make better lifestyle choices.
NewsMakers
Common drug class may increase risk of heart disease
The risk of cardiovascular disease increased in line with how much anticholinergic medication the participants used each year. Those with the highest exposure had a 71 per cent higher risk of a cardiovascular event than people who did not use anticholinergic medication at all.
People who use drugs with anticholinergic effects, including certain antidepressants, drugs for urinary incontinence and common antihistamines, are at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
This is shown in a study from Karolinska Institutet published in BMC Medicine.
Anticholinergic drugs reduce the effect of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine and are commonly prescribed to middle-aged and older people. This large group of drugs includes antihistamines used for allergic conditions, anxiety or insomnia, drugs for urinary incontinence, and certain antidepressants, where tricyclic antidepressants have a strong anticholinergic effect, whereas SSRIs have a weaker effect. A high cumulative use of these drugs, referred to as anticholinergic burden (see fact box), has previously been linked to impaired cognitive ability.
May affect heart regulation
The new study suggests that the drugs may also affect the parasympathetic nervous system and thereby the regulation of the cardiovascular system. The results show that it may be important to monitor the total drug burden in everyday clinical practice.
The study included more than 500,000 people in Stockholm, Sweden, who were 45 years of age or older and had no prior cardiovascular disease, except for hypertension, at the start of the study. The researchers followed the participants for up to 14 years and analysed how the use of anticholinergic drugs was associated with the development of cardiovascular disease.
“Many of these drugs are used by older people and by people with multiple medical conditions. We wanted to investigate whether the total exposure had any significance for the risk of developing cardiovascular disease over time,” says Nanbo Zhu, postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet.
71 per cent higher cardiac risk
The study showed that the risk of cardiovascular disease increased in line with how much anticholinergic medication the participants used each year. Those with the highest exposure had a 71 per cent higher risk of a cardiovascular event than people who did not use anticholinergic medication at all. The association was seen for all types of cardiovascular disease but was particularly clear for heart failure and various forms of arrhythmia.
“Our results indicate that the cumulative drug burden can affect heart regulation, not only in the short term but also over the long term. This does not mean that the drugs should always be avoided, but that exposure should be monitored carefully,” says Hong Xu, assistant professor at the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society.
The researchers point out that the study is observational, meaning it cannot establish a causal relationship. Other factors, such as underlying diseases, may also influence the associations.
The work was carried out within the Stockholm CREAtinine Measurements project in collaboration between several research groups at Karolinska Institutet and Region Stockholm. The study was funded by the Swedish Research Council, the Center for Innovative Medicine Foundation, and other foundations. Some researchers report assignments for the pharmaceutical industry, which are disclosed in the scientific publication.
NewsMakers
Mindfulness practices found to significantly reduce depression symptoms, especially for those with early-life adversity
Mindfulness interventions help by regulating our emotions better when different challenges come up. For someone who has experienced childhood neglect or abuse, mindfulness training can help us make sense of that and respond skillfully to this moment in time.
A new study reveals that mindfulness practices may significantly reduce depression symptoms, particularly in people who have experienced early-life adversity, such as childhood abuse and neglect.
Led by Eric Loucks, professor of medicine, epidemiology, and of behavioral and social sciences and director of the Mindfulness Center at Brown, the study enrolled 201 participants, 101 of whom were randomized into the Mindfulness-Based Blood Pressure Reduction Program, while 100 were randomized into an enhanced usual care control, which included home blood-pressure monitors, physician access and health-education materials. Researchers also had a measure of participants’ early-life adversity, particularly their exposure to abuse or neglect.
Loucks and his team followed participants for six months to assess changes in blood pressure, health behaviors and mental health, finding that those in the mindfulness program showed significant improvements in their depression symptoms. Additionally, participants who experienced childhood neglect showed greater improvements in depression symptoms than those who had not. A similar, though less pronounced, trend was observed among people with a history of childhood abuse.
“In this program, that was primarily designed to lower blood pressure while addressing whole-person health, we also saw that mental well-being, particularly around depression symptoms, improved in participants that went through the program,” Loucks said. “The findings suggest that cultivating mindful self-regulation skills–such such as self-awareness, attention control and emotion regulation–may help interrupt maladaptive patterns shaped by past experiences.”
Over the last 15 years, Loucks has been studying social determinants of health such as early-life adversity and its impacts on cardiovascular health, body mass index and blood pressure. “I came to a point where I wanted to not just document it, but do something about it, and I wondered if mindfulness training might help,” he said. “I’d gone through a lot of mindfulness training myself outside of work and started to get trained up in mindfulness programs that are specific to health contexts.”
Loucks began to study the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program, running it through two clinical trials that were funded by the NIH and finding that it reduced blood pressure in both trials. He also wanted to look at the intervention from a whole-person perspective.
“If we look at everyday folks out in the world, those that had exposure to early life adversity, like abuse and neglect, tend to have worse mental health and also worse cardiovascular health,” Loucks said. “Mindfulness interventions help by regulating our emotions better when different challenges come up. For someone who has experienced childhood neglect or abuse, mindfulness training can help us make sense of that and respond skillfully to this moment in time.”
Loucks discussed this work during a keynote address at the U.S. DOHaD Society this year. “It felt like a coming-home moment to see that this intervention, originally developed to address psychosocial factors that influence health, had even stronger effects among people with early-life adversity, particularly on depression,” he said. “It’s been about a 15-year arc of research that culminated in these findings.”
NewsMakers
High-fiber diet linked to reduced risk of heart disease in night shift workers
A moderate intake of about 19 grams of fibre per day was linked to a lower risk for those who worked night shifts regularly. For those who worked night shifts sporadically, about 15 grams was enough. The current recommendation for adults is about 25 grams of dietary fibre per day.
People who work at night have a higher risk of coronary artery disease, a type of heart disease. A new study suggests that a higher fibre intake in the diet may help reduce this risk. The study included over 220,000 adults in the UK and is published in the European Journal of Epidemiology.
The human body is built to sleep at night. This means that working during the night goes against this natural pattern, and can place additional strain on the body, including the heart. Previous research has linked night work to an increased risk of coronary artery disease. Since night work is often unavoidable, the researchers wanted to investigate whether certain dietary habits might have a protective effect.
More fibre associated with lower risk
The researchers used data from 220,000 adults in the UK Biobank (2006–2010) and divided the participants into three groups:
- Day workers
- Shift workers who worked night shifts sporadically
- Regular night shift workers
The participants had completed a detailed questionnaire about their dietary habits. During a follow-up after about 12 years, it was found that night shift workers who consumed little fibre in their diet had a higher risk of coronary artery disease than those who consumed more fibre.
“A moderate intake of about 19 grams of fibre per day was linked to a lower risk for those who worked night shifts regularly. For those who worked night shifts sporadically, about 15 grams was enough. The current recommendation for adults is about 25 grams of dietary fibre per day,” says Diana Nôga, lead author and researcher at Uppsala University.
The researchers stress that the figures from the study are not official dietary recommendations. But they do show a pattern in this UK study: a higher dietary fibre intake was linked to a lower risk of heart disease among night shift workers.
“The link between fibre and a lower risk of heart disease is not just because those who eat more fibre generally have a healthier lifestyle. We know this because we adjusted for various lifestyle factors in the analysis. One possible explanation, supported by previous research, is that fibre in the diet can improve intestinal flora and also reduce lipids, which can be particularly good for the heart in people who work at night,” says Christian Benedict, senior author of the study and Professor of Pharmacology at Uppsala University.
Dietary fibre can support heart health
According to the researchers, an increased intake of fibre-rich foods such as whole grains, vegetables, fruit, legumes and lentils may be a simple way to improve heart health for night shift workers. However, this requires that you do not have any medical obstacles to doing this, such as chronic gastrointestinal diseases.
“Dietary changes should be seen as a complement to, not a substitute for, other heart health-promoting habits such as not smoking, remaining physically active, and getting enough sleep,” says Diana Nôga.
-
NewsMakers3 weeks agoCreativity feels great — until tomorrow
-
NewsMakers3 weeks agoHigh-fiber diet linked to reduced risk of heart disease in night shift workers
-
NewsMakers3 weeks agoSleeping in on weekends may help boost teens’ mental health
-
Wellness3 weeks agoExercise to treat depression yields similar results to therapy
-
Destinations3 weeks agoChecking the charm of Baguio City’s Café by the Ruins
-
NewsMakers3 weeks agoTwo types of underconfidence linked to anxiety and gender
-
Wellness3 weeks agoAerobic exercise may be most effective for relieving depression/anxiety symptoms
-
NewsMakers2 weeks agoMindfulness practices found to significantly reduce depression symptoms, especially for those with early-life adversity
