{"id":9416,"date":"2024-06-25T08:51:26","date_gmt":"2024-06-25T00:51:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/?p=9416"},"modified":"2024-06-25T08:51:45","modified_gmt":"2024-06-25T00:51:45","slug":"chronic-loneliness-may-increase-stroke-risk-among-older-adults","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/chronic-loneliness-may-increase-stroke-risk-among-older-adults\/","title":{"rendered":"Chronic loneliness may increase stroke risk among older adults"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Chronic loneliness may significantly raise older adults\u2019 risk of stroke, according to a new study led by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cLoneliness is increasingly considered a major public health issue. Our findings further highlight why that is,\u201d said lead author Yenee Soh, research associate in the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences. \u201cEspecially when experienced chronically, our study suggests loneliness may play an important role in stroke incidence, which is already one of the leading causes of long-term disability and mortality worldwide.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While previous research has linked loneliness to higher risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, few have examined the impact on stroke risk specifically. This study is one of the first to examine the association between loneliness changes and stroke risk over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Using 2006-2018 data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the researchers assessed the association between changes in loneliness and stroke incidence over time. During 2006-2008, 12,161 participants\u2014all adults ages 50 and above who never had a stroke\u2014responded to questions on the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale, from which the researchers created summary loneliness scores. Four years later (2010-2012), 8,936 participants who remained in the study responded to the same questions again. The researchers then placed the participants into one of four groups according to their loneliness scores across the two time points: \u201cconsistently low\u201d (those who scored low on the loneliness scale at both baseline and follow-up); \u201cremitting\u201d (those who scored high at baseline and low at follow-up); \u201crecent onset\u201d (those who scored low at baseline and high at follow-up); and \u201cconsistently high\u201d (those who scored high at both baseline and follow-up).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among the participants whose loneliness was measured at baseline only, 1,237 strokes occurred during the follow-up period (2006-2018). Among the participants who provided two assessments of loneliness over time, 601 strokes occurred during the follow-up period (2010-2018). The researchers analyzed each group\u2019s risk of stroke over the follow-up period in the context of their experiences with loneliness, controlling for other health and behavioral risk factors. These included social isolation and depressive symptoms, which are closely related but distinct from loneliness.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The findings showed a link between loneliness and higher risk of stroke and found that chronic loneliness heightened risk the most. When loneliness was assessed at baseline only, the participants considered lonely had a 25% higher risk of stroke than those not considered lonely. Among the participants who reported loneliness at two time points, those in the \u201cconsistently high\u201d group had a 56% higher risk of stroke than those in the \u201cconsistently low\u201d group, even after accounting for a broad range of other known risk factors. While the baseline analyses suggest loneliness at one time point was associated with higher risk, those who experienced remitting or recent onset loneliness did not show a clear pattern of increased risk of stroke\u2014suggesting that loneliness\u2019 impact on stroke risk occurs over the longer term.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cRepeat assessments of loneliness may help identify those who are chronically lonely and are therefore at a higher risk for stroke. If we fail to address their feelings of loneliness, on a micro and macro scale, there could be profound health consequences,\u201d said Soh. \u201cImportantly, these interventions must specifically target loneliness, which is a subjective perception and should not be conflated with social isolation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The authors noted that further research examining both nuanced changes in loneliness over the short-term, as well as loneliness patterns over a longer period of time, may help shed additional light on the loneliness-stroke association. They also noted that more research is needed to understand the potential underlying mechanisms, and that the study findings were limited to middle-aged and older adults and may not be generalizable to younger individuals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Other Harvard Chan authors included Ichiro Kawachi, Laura Kubzansky, Lisa Berkman, and Henning Tiemeier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cChronic Loneliness and the Risk of Incident Stroke in Middle and Late Adulthood: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of U.S. Older Adults<\/a>\u201d was written by Yenee Soh, Ichiro Kawachi, Laura D. Kubzansky, Lisa F. Berkman, Henning Tiemeier,\u00a0and appeared in eClinicalMedicine<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When loneliness was assessed at baseline only, the participants considered lonely had a 25% higher risk of stroke than those not considered lonely. Among the participants who reported loneliness at two time points, those in the \u201cconsistently high\u201d group had a 56% higher risk of stroke than those in the \u201cconsistently low\u201d group, even after accounting for a broad range of other known risk factors.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":9076,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[2309,848],"class_list":["post-9416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-newsmakers","tag-depression","tag-mental-health"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9416"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9416\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9417,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9416\/revisions\/9417"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9076"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}