{"id":6057,"date":"2020-06-23T10:35:42","date_gmt":"2020-06-23T10:35:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/?p=6057"},"modified":"2020-06-23T02:40:23","modified_gmt":"2020-06-23T02:40:23","slug":"to-make-a-good-impression-leave-cell-phone-alone-during-work-meetings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/to-make-a-good-impression-leave-cell-phone-alone-during-work-meetings\/","title":{"rendered":"To make a good impression, leave cell phone alone during work meetings"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>To get on the good side of a new boss, colleague or acquaintance in a business meeting, leave your cell phone stashed in your pocket or purse.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That is the implication of a&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2050157920927049\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">new study<\/a>&nbsp;conducted by University of Kansas Assistant Professor of Communication Studies Cameron W. Piercy and doctoral candidate Greta R. Underhill. It is titled &#8220;Expectations of technology use during meetings: An experimental test of manager policy, device use, and task acknowledgment&#8221; and was published in the journal&nbsp;<em>Mobile Media &amp; Communication.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Looking at your phone during a meeting is akin to &#8220;phubbing,&#8221; or snubbing your interlocutor, in a strictly social setting, the study found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The authors prepared video vignettes of people using either a paper notebook, a cell phone or a laptop computer while participating in a business meeting. They refer to this scenario as &#8220;multicommunication.&#8221; Then they asked 243 viewers to rate the distracted meeting member&#8217;s competence and the effectiveness of the meeting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Other variables studied included the meeting manager&#8217;s expectations for technology use in the workplace and whether the user apologized later that their technology use was work-related.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It mattered not whether the cell phone user stipulated afterward that their usage was strictly business-related. Viewers still rated them down, and to a significant degree more than those who used a computer or notepad.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a recent interview, Piercy said the results can largely be attributed to a phenomenon known to social scientists as &#8220;introspective illusion.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;We know you can do work on your phone,&#8221; Piercy said. But he added that because we also know phones can be used to scroll idly through social-media feeds, &#8220;we assume that you&#8217;re not working when we see you&#8217;re using it.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is true even of people who themselves use a mobile device during a business meeting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;We can always infer our own thoughts and motives, but we can&#8217;t ever know a partner&#8217;s thoughts and motives, so we make negative assumptions about others, and we make excuses for ourselves,&#8221; Piercy said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In line with this new concept, the mobile introspective illusion, people did not rate the technology user any differently if they apologized for using their device. Piercy said, &#8220;People expect that technology is used for ill, even when the person using the technology says their use is related to the topic of conversation.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A manager&#8217;s attitude toward technology in the workplace does seem to matter somewhat, in terms of viewers&#8217; evaluations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;When the manager articulated a policy, those who acknowledged their multicommunication were evaluated higher and seen as more competent,&#8221; the authors write in their paper. &#8220;In the absence of a policy, the pattern is reversed. Finally, the means for communicator evaluation and competence were highest in the pro-technology policy condition. In all, when the manager&#8217;s policy is matched by employee&#8217;s behavior, outcome means tend to be higher.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;The manager articulating a clear policy about expectations of technology use ought to affect the way that people engage with technology in the workplace,&#8221; Piercy said. &#8220;But so is the idea that people would be excused if they apologize for using technology. And in that case, we didn&#8217;t find a significant effect.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the effect of cell phone use on viewers&#8217; perceptions was dramatic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;The effect for the phone is ginormous,&#8221; Piercy quipped. &#8220;It&#8217;s as big an effect as you&#8217;ll ever see in a social-science study &#8212; 30% of the variance. You can just look at the numbers and see it. But the notebook was less of a problem than the computer, which was less of a problem than the phone. So even if you were to use a laptop in the meeting, you&#8217;d be better off than using your phone because there was this big spike in all the numbers that are associated with using the phone, relative to the other two.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Piercy noted that the study asked viewers to judge the interactions they saw on screen, simulating a meeting with a new person or boss. Attitudes might change, he said, in a situation where all the participants know each other &#8211; and the boss&#8217;s expectations &#8212; well.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To get on the good side of a new boss, colleague or acquaintance in a business meeting, leave your cell phone stashed in your pocket or purse.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":6058,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[511,252,2391],"class_list":["post-6057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-newsmakers","tag-mobile-technology","tag-technology","tag-technology-at-home"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6057"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6057\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6059,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6057\/revisions\/6059"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6058"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/zestmag.com\/online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}