Connect with us

Wellness

To ice or not to ice? Icing promotes muscle regeneration after mild injury

Cumulative research by a multi-institutional Japanese research collaboration reveals that ‘to ice or not to ice’ may depend on the degree of muscle injury.

Published

on

Applying ice to a muscle injury is a widespread first-aid treatment, but exactly what effect does this have on the muscle regeneration and does it really help? Cumulative research by a multi-institutional Japanese research collaboration reveals that ‘to ice or not to ice’ may depend on the degree of muscle injury.

In their latest research, the group consisting of Associate Professor ARAKAWA Takamitsu and Master’s student NAGATA Itsuki (from Kobe University’s Graduate School of Health Sciences), and Assistant Professor KAWASHIMA Masato (Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare) et al. have shown that applying ice to muscle damage in a small percentage of muscle fibers in rats promotes muscle regeneration. This is believed to be the first study in the world to show benefits of icing on muscle repair. In conjunction with their previous study on serious muscle injuries (‘Icing muscle injuries may delay recovery’), it is hoped that these results can be used as a basis for more accurate guidelines on whether or not to ice such injuries.

These research findings were first reported in the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology on March 6, 2023.

Main Points

  • The experiments showed that applying ice after a mild muscle injury promotes muscle regeneration.
  • This is believed to be the first time in the world that a study has shown a positive effect of icing on muscle regeneration.
  • The researchers showed that the extent of the injury may have a greater impact on the effectiveness of icing than the method or timing employed.
  • The findings of this ongoing research will lead to the spread of more accurate information on the effects of icing throughout hospitals, and in the realms of sports and physical education.

‘RICE treatment’ is a common approach for treating the acute phase of sports injuries. This acronym stands for Rest, Ice, Compression and Elevation and it is also often used in physical education in schools and even clinical settings. There are a variety of subsequent steps that can be taken to treat the injury afterwards, yet opinions vary as to whether or not icing should be applied. However, there is a lack of evidence on the benefits of icing.

The current research team has conducted many experiments to investigate the effectiveness of icing, which led them to publish their previous findings (‘Icing muscle injuries may delay recovery’ ). However, no previous animal experiments have indicated that icing promotes muscle regeneration.

In this study, the researchers focused on altering the severity of the muscle injury in the experiments. The reasoning behind this was that the majority of sports-related muscle injuries are limited; in other words less than 10% of the overall number of muscle fibers (myofibers) are damaged and necrotized. However, all animal experiments up until now had looked at more serious injuries where over 20% of the myofibers were damaged.

Thus, the team devised an animal model for mild muscle injuries, and experimented with applying ice after injury using a similar method as before.

After the animal was anaesthetized, the muscle was exposed and clamped between forceps to induce injury. In their previous experiments, the researchers attached a 500g weight to the forceps, which induced an injury that affected 20% of the total number of fibers in the muscle. In the present study, they tried attaching a 250g weight to the forceps and demonstrated that this could be used to consistently injure 4% of the fibers (Figure 1). This is similar to the degree of injury that often occurs after sports activities such as vigorous exercise or long-distance marathon running.

Icing was carried out by placing polyethylene bags of ice on surface of the skin over three 30-minute sessions per day, with each session being 1.5 hours apart. This was continued until two days after injury for a total of 9 icing sessions (i.e. immediately after injury = 3 sessions, 1 day after injury = 3 sessions, 2 days after injury = 3 sessions). The icing method was the same as in the previously reported study (‘Icing muscle injuries may delay recovery’).

Observations of muscles that were regenerating in the icing group and no-icing group 2 weeks after injury revealed significant differences in the size of regenerating fibers in cross-sections (Figure 2). In other words, this demonstrated the possibility that skeletal muscle regeneration is promoted by icing.

Macrophages are immune cells that orchestrate the reparative process of injured muscle. Pro-inflammatory macrophages accumulate in the damaged site soon after injury occurs, however they express an inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which has a disadvantageous side-effect of expanding the injury’s sizeThe results of this team’s experiments revealed that icing after mild muscle injury reduces the accumulation of iNOS-expressing pro-inflammatory macrophagesBy causing this phenomenon, icing prevents the expansion of muscle injury size.

In other words, icing attenuates the recruitment of pro-inflammatory macrophages in the injury site. This was also reported in their previous study (‘Icing muscle injuries may delay recovery’), demonstrating that this is an effect caused by icing regardless of whether the muscle injury is serious or mild. In the previous study, icing was found to delay the regeneration of muscle after a serious injury that destroyed many fibers because the pro-inflammatory macrophages were unable to sufficiently phagocytose (*5) the injured muscle. In contrast to this, the current study shows that icing has a positive effect when the muscle injury is mild because it prevents the secondary expansion of the muscle injury caused by the pro-inflammatory macrophages. It suggests that this particular effect of icing is connected to the promotion of muscle regeneration.

Icing has been used in the treatment of muscle injuries for a long time, however the positive effects of icing had yet to be elucidated until now. This study has shown that icing can promote muscle regeneration when used to treat commonly-occurring mild muscle injuries.

However, this does not mean that icing is effective for all types or degree of muscle injury. The researchers aim to further elucidate and raise awareness of this. For example, the group’s previous study showed that icing actually inhibited regeneration in cases of serious muscle injury. In addition, the term ‘muscle injury’ also includes extremely minute injuries that have yet to be observed through the team’s animal experiments, so it is still unclear as to what effect icing has on the repair from such microtraumas.

The researchers’ next challenge is to determine the extent of muscle injury up to which icing is appropriate. By building upon their previous investigations, they aim to contribute towards guidelines that will enable people in sports and clinical rehabilitation to make accurate judgements about whether or not to ice an injury.

Zest Magazine accepts contributions promoting everything about living the good life (and how to make this so). C'mon, give us a yell.

NewsMakers

Workout or nap? Either can help your sleepless brain, study finds

People who either completed 20 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous exercise or took a 90-minute nap performed about 22 per cent better on memory tests after 30 hours without sleep than those who did neither.

Published

on

A short workout or a nap can help protect memory after a sleepless night, a McGill University-led study has found.

Researchers found people who either completed 20 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous exercise or took a 90-minute nap performed about 22 per cent better on memory tests after 30 hours without sleep than those who did neither. The findings, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), point to practical ways to counter the effects of sleep deprivation.

“Sleep loss affects nearly every aspect of how we think and function, but many people can’t simply stop what they’re doing and get more sleep,” said senior author Marc Roig, Professor in McGill’s School of Physical and Occupational Therapy. “Our findings show that even a brief bout of exercise may help preserve one of our most important cognitive abilities.”

The study involved 54 healthy young adults who stayed awake for 30 consecutive hours under lab supervision. Participants were then assigned to one of three groups: a 20-minute cycling session, a 90-minute nap or a control condition. Three days later, researchers tested their memory for images they had viewed immediately after the intervention. Those who exercised or napped remembered significantly more images than participants who did neither.

Same result, different pathways

While the memory benefits were nearly identical, brain recordings revealed that exercise and napping helped in different ways.

Napping appeared to help the brain recharge, making it easier to take in and remember new information. Exercise, by contrast, helped the brain use its remaining resources more efficiently, without making participants feel more tired.

The findings could eventually inform fatigue-management strategies in workplaces where sleep loss is common and mistakes can have serious consequences, such as health care, transportation and emergency response.

“A nap isn’t always possible in the middle of a shift,” said first author Madhura Lotlikar, a doctoral candidate in McGill’s Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery. “Exercise is accessible, inexpensive and easy to implement. That makes it a promising tool to help people stay cognitively sharp when sleep is limited.”

The researchers emphasize that exercise cannot replace sleep, but it may help people function better when getting enough rest isn’t possible.

About the study

Protecting episodic memory after sleep loss: Similar benefits of exercise and naps via distinct neural contributions” by Madhura Lotlikar and Marc Roig et al., was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

Continue Reading

Wellness

Walking and weight training alone are not enough for strong bones – football and handball may be more effective

Bone formation was stimulated most effectively by activities involving explosive movements, rapid changes of direction, and turning. The findings could help improve exercise programs designed to maintain bone health and prevent osteoporosis. 

Published

on

By

When it comes to maintaining healthy bones, how intensely we exercise may matter more than how much we exercise, according to researchers at Semmelweis University.

Their study, published in Sports Medicine – Open, found that bone formation was stimulated most effectively by activities involving explosive movements, rapid changes of direction, and turning. The findings could help improve exercise programs designed to maintain bone health and prevent osteoporosis. 

Researchers at Semmelweis University analyzed the results of 24 clinical studies involving a total of 1,238 healthy adult participants. Rather than tracking changes in bone mineral density, the studies measured substances in the blood that indicate whether the body is actively building new bone tissue. These so-called biomarkers can reflect the effects of exercise within just a few weeks, providing feedback much earlier than bone density measurements.  

“What makes our study unique is that we examined not only the type of exercise – whether endurance, resistance, or combined training – but also exercise intensity, frequency, and duration. Our goal was to determine which forms of exercise stimulate bone metabolism most effectively and which appear to be less beneficial from this perspective,” said dr. Péter Ferdinandy, Vice-Rector for Science and Innovations at Semmelweis University and senior author of the study. 

The most effective activities were high-intensity sports involving frequent explosive movements, rapid changes of direction, and turning. Recreational football and handball, for example, were associated with increases of up to 45–46 percent in the levels of substances linked to bone formation. In contrast, walking, step aerobics, and traditional gym-based resistance exercises were generally less effective.  

What should you keep in mind?
It is important not to start a high-intensity exercise program suddenly or without proper preparation. This is particularly true for people with cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, or metabolic diseases, as well as those living with osteoporosis. Before beginning a new type of exercise or a more demanding training program, they should consult their treating physician, general practitioner, or a sports medicine specialist to ensure that the activity and its intensity are appropriate for their individual health status.

“The most surprising finding was that resistance training did not produce a significant effect on markers of bone metabolism, even though several professional guidelines recommend this type of exercise for maintaining bone health. Likewise, low- or moderate-intensity endurance exercise, such as walking or jogging, showed no meaningful long-term effect,” explained Viktória Barna, PhD student at Semmelweis University and first author of the study.

This, of course, does not mean that walking or lower-intensity physical activity is without health benefits. However, if the goal is to keep bones strong and healthy for as long as possible, they appear to require a greater mechanical stimulus. 

According to the World Health Organization, regular physical activity offers numerous health benefits. However, our findings suggest that low-intensity exercise alone is not sufficient to stimulate bone metabolism. High-intensity exercise may trigger early beneficial changes in bone formation, potentially helping to slow bone loss and support healthy ageing,” summarized dr. Nóra Sydó, clinical specialist and co-author of the study. 

According to the researchers, these findings could contribute to the development of evidence-based exercise programs aimed at maintaining bone health and preventing osteoporosis. 

Continue Reading

NewsMakers

Move to quit: Exercise boosts smoking quit rates

Researchers found that people taking part in exercise programs were 15% more likely to achieve continuous abstinence and 21% more likely to report not smoking over a seven-day period, compared with control groups.

Published

on

A pack-a-day smoker can spend around $14,000 a year on cigarettes, yet despite the financial and health costs, quitting remains one of the most difficult changes many people will ever attempt.

Now, new research from Adelaide University shows that exercise can help people quit smoking by reducing cigarette consumption, easing cravings and improving their chances of quitting.

Researchers found that people taking part in exercise programs were 15% more likely to achieve continuous abstinence and 21% more likely to report not smoking over a seven-day period, compared with control groups.

They also found that exercise could reduce cigarette consumption by two cigarettes per day, and that a single bout of exercise immediately reduced cigarette cravings for up to 30 minutes after exercise.

The systematic review and meta-analysis examined 59 randomised controlled trials involving more than 9000 participants, exploring the effects of both single bouts of exercise and long-term exercise programs on smoking cessation, cravings, withdrawal symptoms and mood.

Globally, tobacco smoking remains the leading preventable cause of premature morbidity and mortality, accounting for about 7 million deaths, including an estimated 1.6 million non-smokers who are exposed to second-hand smoke.

Around the world, e-cigarette use has now reached more than 100 million people.

The researchers say exercise should be viewed as an additional tool that can be used alongside established smoking cessation support.

Lead researcher, Dr Ben Singh said the findings provide smokers with a practical, low-cost tool that can support their quitting journey.

“Quitting smoking is one of the best things a person can do for their health, but it’s also one of the hardest,” Dr Singh said.

“Many smokers want to quit, but the current approaches don’t work for everyone. That’s why we need more strategies that people can incorporate into their daily lives at little or no cost.

“Something as simple as regular exercise can make a meaningful difference to people trying to quit, helping them manage cravings, smoke less and improve their chances of quitting.”

While smoking rates have reduced over the past two decadesdemand for e-cigarettes and heated-tobacco products have risen, targeting the younger generation.

Today, 80% of the 1.3 billion tobacco users worldwide live in low- and middle-income countries, yet in contrast, vaping has risen across many OECD countries.

Senior researcher Adelaide University’s Professor Carol Maher said exercise could be used strategically to ward off tobacco cravings.

“Quitting smoking does not have to begin and end with willpower alone,” Prof Maher said.

“Cravings can be difficult to manage, but they often pass. Our review found that even a single bout of exercise can reduce cravings for up to 30 minutes, which may help people get through some of the hardest moments of a quit attempt.

“Exercise should not replace evidence-based quit supports such as counselling and smoking cessation medication, but it may be a practical, low-cost strategy that people can use alongside them.”

The researchers say the next step is to test how exercise can be built into real-world quit programs, including digital, community and clinical services, and to examine whether it can also support people trying to quit vaping, where evidence is currently lacking.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Like Us On Facebook

Loading...

Most Popular

Copyright ©FRINGE PUBLISHING. All rights reserved.